Sunday, March 29, 2026

Lunch, Thirty Years Later

*As always, names are changed to protect people's privacy.

According to my journal, the last time my middle school friend, Ivy, came to my house was on Sunday, April 14, 1996. 

That day, along with our friend Aviva, Ivy and I got together to work on a group project, an ongoing endeavor that had spanned ten weeks. I was not looking forward to this meeting, as my friendships with both girls had been heavily strained all year and were clearly ending. This project had caused an even greater rift between us, as I was constantly bickering with Ivy and Aviva, and they were constantly bickering with me. However, to my great surprise, I actually got along great with them that day. My mom ordered in lunch for us (hoagies, if memory serves me correctly), and we had fun while getting a lot of work done. Perhaps there was hope for repair.

The next day at school, we were fighting again. 

As you saw in a series of posts that I began in the fall of 2024 and completed in the spring and summer of 2025, middle school was pure hell for me, rife with bullying and ultimately being ostracized from my friend group. Ivy, who had once been the closest of these friends, stood by while another once-close friend, Torey, kicked me out of the lunch table in the beginning of 9th grade (part of the middle school in our district). By the end of the year, none of my friendships survived.

However, something interesting happened when I was writing the series: I friend requested Ivy and Torey on Facebook. Long story short, Ivy followed a link I had posted to this piece and commented on it, apologizing for ending our friendship. She admitted what I had suspected for years, that she felt if she continued to be seen with me, she would be bullied as relentlessly as I was. I eventually messaged Torey, and she and I had a similar discussion, which also resulted in her apologizing. Reconnecting with both women and clearing the air proved to be therapeutic: I realized that the school had failed Ivy and Torey almost as much as it had failed me. Talking about those years also helped me truly put a traumatic part of my life in the past where it belonged. It also taught me that it is never too late to patch things up. As I talked to both Ivy and Torey, I learned that I liked the smart, caring adults they had both become.

And finally, on November 30, 2025, Ivy came to my parents' house for the first time since that day in 1996 when we worked on the project together. I was visiting Pennsylvania for Thanksgiving week, and I suggested that she, Torey, and I get together. She drove all the way up from Delaware, her five-year-old daughter, Fern, in tow. After she came inside and exchanged greetings with my parents, we got into Ivy's car and drove to a nearby diner to meet Torey. 

For the first time in almost thirty years, Ivy, Torey, and I ate lunch together. I think what was the most remarkable about this reunion was how unremarkable it was. We were no longer insecure, terrified kids in the pure hell that is middle school. We were calm, well-adjusted adults-- who also had insecurities. In fact, we discussed these insecurities with ease. I talked about my therapist, Oren, who had died suddenly earlier that month. Both Ivy and Torey expressed sympathy for my loss. Torey also talked about a personal anxiety issue she was struggling with, and I offered advice. While it matters that we are adults instead of kids talking about this, being adults in the 21st Century is just as relevant, if not more. In middle school, I wouldn't have even admitted to going to a therapist. I'm not sure adults in the '90s would have discussed such a thing with each other. It was still largely a taboo subject back then.

We also laughed, of course. Torey had a great time getting to know Ivy's daughter, Fern. "Someone's made a friend!" I commented, as Fern sat in Torey's lap and giggled. 

Did we talk about our days in middle school? For about two minutes. I brought my 7th- and 8th-grade yearbooks. Ivy and Torey both laughed at the messages they had written to me. Then, Torey flipped through the book and said, "I don't remember any of these people." I quietly put the yearbooks away.

After lunch, Torey gave me a hug before getting into her car. She said she might bring her kids up to Boston to visit sometime. I promised to show her around the city. Ivy drove me back to my parents' house so that Fern could use the bathroom-- and meet my cat, Neptune, who was also visiting. When Ivy asked where the bathroom was, I said, "The same place it was thirty years ago," and then pointed it out. As Ivy was getting ready to leave, she said, "I'm so glad we did this," to which I said, "Me too. And we'll do it again."

I have no doubt that we will.


Sunday, March 22, 2026

What My Pets Taught Me About Mercy

Content note: This post contains discussion of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. If you are in a moment of crisis, please call the suicide hotline at 988 if in the United States or Canada, or the hotline that is available in your country.

Note: Well, I didn't see it coming. One post about grieving the sudden loss of my therapist, Oren, ultimately became the first in a trilogy of entries about death. 

*As always, names are changed to protect people's privacy

When I was in fifth grade, my teacher read our class Tuck Everlasting, a children's novel in which a ten-year-old girl named Winnie befriends the Tuck family, whose members are immortal. Eighty-seven years prior, the Tucks-- Angus, Mae, Jesse, and Miles-- had inadvertently drunk from a spring that made them not only indestructible, but unable to age. Winnie is tempted to drink the water herself, but the Tucks will not allow her to leave until she agrees to keep their secret and not drink it. Although not suffering in the traditional sense, the Tucks have long tired of life and do not see immortality as a blessing.

One day, after reading a chapter from the book, the teacher began a discussion that I cannot imagine happening today in a classroom of fifth graders: she asked us if we would want to live forever. I remember being very surprised that most of the other kids gave an emphatic no. One boy said, "I would just want to get it over with," an answer I clearly recall finding disturbing. The teacher also said that she imagined that life would eventually get boring. I couldn't understand it. Why would death be preferable to life-- ever

I have since changed my views on this issue, with the caveat that my position is that I would like to live indefinitely-- so long as I'm not suffering-- but I would not like to be indestructible. If futurist Ray Kurzweil's predictions about scientific advances are to be believed, this very well might be possible one day. Scientists have already found a way to reverse aging in mice. If this is eventually transferred to humans, then you could theoretically live indefinitely and decide on your own terms when to stop the clock. Of course, there are practical and ethical implications for this, but that's another discussion for another day. 

So when did I change my mind about death ever being preferable to life? The events that forced me to rethink my position happened about six months later when my dog, a Doberman mix named Smoky, died a protracted and horrific death.

One evening when I was twelve, Smoky, who was prone to epilepsy, had a seizure, his body thrashing about violently. I didn't witness it, but my parents told me it was especially intense. He couldn't stand up, so I urged my parents to take him to the vet. They thought he was just exhausted from the seizure, so they decided to wait it out. After a couple days, Smoky was both vomiting and defecating blood. To this day, I can still vividly recall the putrid, fetid smell. 

Now that the situation was clearly an emergency, my parents brought Smoky to the vet. 

I was terrified as my dad drove the car, my brother and me in tow. Immediately, I feared the worst, that the vet was going to put Smoky to sleep. I knew what euthanasia was, and I had always found it disturbing that people would ever have their pet killed. Instead, the vet kept him at the office for a few nights to run tests and attempt treatments. He later told us that Smoky had acidosis, a condition in which there is too much acid in relation to base in his system, and it might have been caused by a bacterial infection. At first, treatment seemed to be working. But it was not without its setbacks-- at one point during Smoky's stay, he went into a coma. However, he woke up, started to improve, and we brought him home to recover.

My dog was never the same.

Smoky's behavior proved erratic. We had to confine him to the garage because his instinct to avoid sitting in his own waste was apparently gone. The vet wasn't sure if this issue would resolve. Smoky would tremble violently when approached, and sometimes he would even bite. Most disturbingly, over the next two-and-a-half months, he began to rapidly lose weight and was constantly hungry, devouring a month's worth of dog food in a week and constantly defecating. One time, when left alone in the garage while my brother and I were at school and my parents at work, he was so desperately hungry that he tried to eat a wrench. 

Once again, Dad consulted the vet. During the course of those couple months, there were one or two more overnight stays at the veterinary office for monitoring and attempts at treatment. The vet suspected that Smoky had brain damage. As for the weight loss, he said it was possible that Smoky's intestines-- injured from his illness-- might have healed in scar tissue and would never be able to absorb food again. Another possibility was that his pancreas wasn't working properly. Finally, he said that he would try one more treatment that would target pancreatic function. If there was no improvement within two weeks, it would mean that the problem was in his intestines and we would have to put him to sleep.

Smoky was suffering horrifically. I can only imagine what it must have been like for him to be literally starving to death, and the terror he must have felt was likely exacerbated due to the brain damage. But I was suffering too. I loved that dog. The two of us were very close. We spent a lot of time playing together, and he slept on my bed every night. He also was a very loving and compassionate dog. If he saw me crying, he jumped in my lap and licked my face. We had had him for a little over five years, and when you're a kid, five years is a long time. I couldn't fathom losing him.

The ambiguity throughout this ordeal was the worst. Some days, it seemed like Smoky was getting better. Other days, he clearly wasn't. I was constantly plagued with the question as to whether my dog would ever recover and if things would get back to normal. I cried several times a week during those couple months. I recall one evening, during one of those crying episodes, being in the car with Dad, who was desperately trying to get me to understand why euthanasia would be the humane and compassionate choice if treatment didn't work. He finally said, "If you really love that dog, you will let him go if the vet says that there's nothing he can do." I remember nodding in reluctant resignation, even as I cried. I was starting to get it-- sort of. 

One Tuesday afternoon, after only a week of treatment, I came home from school to find Smoky gone. Dad explained that that morning, Smoky's back legs weren't working and he couldn't get up, so he took him to the vet and left him there for another overnight stay. Because Smoky had stayed overnight at the vet before, I didn't question it.

A few days later, on Saturday morning, it was over. My parents called my brother and me to the living room to break the news. "I just got off the phone with the vet," Dad said softly. "Smoky died last night." As my eyes widened in horror, I asked what happened. Dad said, "A blood vessel burst in his brain."

Inconsolable, I ran upstairs to my room, locked the door, and once again collapsed into tears. It was one of the longest days of my life. I remember my parents taking my brother and me to the arcade to give us something to distract us from the grief we were both feeling. I played video games on autopilot, not really enjoying them as much as my parents probably hoped I would. 

As the months passed, Smoky's death proved to be a crystallizing event in my life. Losing him was intense, but in hindsight, after I cried it out, there was one emotion that dominated: relief. His suffering was over, as was mine as a result. Several months later, we got a new dog, a yellow Lab named Savannah, who lived to be fourteen and a half, a decent lifespan for a dog that size. She also died via euthanasia when her severe arthritis (common in her breed) was no longer manageable.

It was about a year after Smoky died that I first heard the name "Dr. Kevorkian." I didn't pay attention to the news, but on occasion I heard people mention him and what he was famous for. At the time, I assumed he was just some doctor at a hospital doing his job, and I didn't give it a second thought. By then, I had come to realize that Dad was right: there are things worse than death, and in that time I came to appreciate that it was for the best that Smoky had died. Euthanasia was done for animals, so I assumed it was done for people too. I remember being surprised to learn that this wasn't the case, and after that I strongly supported euthanasia for suffering people with no hope of recovery. Even at that young age, I thought it made absolute sense, and I couldn't understand why it was such a controversial issue. I had learned my lesson at age twelve, so why did so many adults not understand it? It seemed odd in light of my fifth-grade group discussion in which most kids said they would not want to live forever. I felt so strongly about the issue that I wrote a position paper in support of it for my eighth-grade social studies class. My parents supported euthanasia as an option for ending suffering from severe illness, and my dad was especially vocal about it.

In fact, a few years after Smoky died, Dad eventually confessed to me what you probably already guessed from reading this: Smoky didn't die from a brain hemorrhage. Dad had him put to sleep. That morning when he saw that Smoky couldn't stand up, Dad decided that enough was enough, and that it would be cruel to let this continue. On the way to work that morning, he took him to the vet to be euthanized. He and Mom waited until Saturday to tell me that the dog "died last night" so that grief wouldn't interfere with school.

In any case, I appreciate more than ever the horrific-- but humane-- decision my dad had to make. One day when I was twenty-seven and living in Brooklyn, my first cat, Ditmas, who was only two and a half years old, began gasping for air and dragging her back legs along the floor. I brought her to the vet, who took one look at her, listened to her heart, and said, "She's in trouble. Get her to the animal hospital in Manhattan, and don't waste any time." I got into a cab and rushed to the hospital, where the vet said that Ditmas could have bronchitis-- which was treatable-- or she could have heart disease. I left her overnight so that they could run some tests. 

The following evening, the vet called me and said, "Ditmas has severe heart disease." She explained that my cat had dilated cardiomyopathy, in which the heart fails to pump efficiently and increases in size to try to compensate, which only makes things worse. She also explained that Ditmas was behaving erratically and forming blood clots in her brain. I immediately thought to myself, "I can't in good conscience keep her alive like this," and then I said aloud, "And I have to put her down?" but it came out more like a statement than a question. The vet said, "Yes," and I said, "Okay. Just keep her comfortable. I'll be right there." They told me they would keep her in an oxygen chamber until I arrived. 

If there was any doubt that euthanasia was the right decision, it was torpedoed when I saw Ditmas. This was not the cat I knew. She wasn't herself at all, was clearly terrified, and even something in her eyes looked off. I cradled Ditmas and told her that I loved her as the vet administered the anesthesia, and then the euthanasia. She died in my arms.

My current cat, Neptune, is eighteen years old. He has chronic kidney disease, hyperthyroidism, and elevated liver enzymes. His conditions are somewhat manageable through a prescription diet and medication. However, I know that within a couple years-- or maybe even a couple months (kidney disease is notoriously unpredictable), I am going to have to make a difficult decision. My one consolation is that, unlike Smoky and Ditmas, Neptune will have lived a long life; the average lifespan for a cat is fifteen years. It will be difficult to lose him, but not in the same way as it was with my other two pets that died young. I am glad that this decision will be available, because I would never want Neptune to suffer. I would want that decision available for people too, because I wouldn't want them to suffer.

And it was Smoky that made me understand that.







Friday, February 6, 2026

Another Post About Death

 *As always, names are changed to protect people's privacy

When I was six or seven, I had a subscription to Sesame Street Magazine, a monthly publication based on the children's show that featured games, puzzles, and stories with Big Bird and friends. After reading and doing a few activities, I sometimes looked at the detachable parents' guide that came meshed between the middle pages of the magazine. Because I loved reading, even the parent-aimed insert was fair game for brain food. One article in the guide was about how parents can respond when their children ask difficult questions. I still remember two of the more amusing ones. One such tough question was, "Mommy, what's a dam? Is it like when Daddy says 'God damn?'" Another involved a child asking if her dead pet rabbit that the family had buried in the backyard went to heaven. At least I think it was a rabbit. My brain might be meshing the story with a scene from a Simpsons episode that came out about ten years later. 

In any case, after reading the question about the deceased pet-- rabbit or otherwise-- I asked my mother a question of my own: "What do they mean about it going to heaven?" I asked, showing her the article. "Can't they just dig it up to see if it is still there?" Mom smiled and told me that some people believe in a soul. She explained what it meant, saying that they believe the soul leaves the body and goes to heaven. Because I wasn't raised in a particularly religious household, it was the first time I had ever heard about the concept, and I responded by telling my mother exactly what I thought: "That can't happen."

Ah, yes, kids say the darnedest things-- or the damnedest things, in this case. But at age 45, my view on the issue remains unchanged. I don't believe in a soul or an afterlife. Nor do I believe in God. I was raised in the Reform Jewish religion, and since the emphasis is more on culture and tradition than strong faith in God, I was given ample room to explore, question, and come to my own conclusions. The idea of surviving one's death through a soul that leaves the body just never made any sense to me. Most importantly, today I reject the idea based on what scientists now know about how the brain works and that injury to it can drastically alter someone's personality, or even render their personality non-existent. That is, all available evidence strongly indicates that consciousness is a byproduct of complex neurological activity, and that what makes you, you is your brain.

A few people have responded in abject disbelief as to how I can get up in the morning thinking that there is no afterlife. About twenty years ago, this topic somehow came up at the Brooklyn office where I worked at the time. "What about my mother?" one coworker asked me, his voice laced with distress, when I told him what I thought. "And if there's no afterlife, then what's the meaning of life?" Not sure how to balance tact and honesty in responding to him, I did the only thing that made sense in the moment: I resorted to humor. "I don't know," I said. "I'll let you know the answer to that when I'm dead." I don't recall how the rest of the conversation unfolded, but I would hope that this coworker would realize that my feelings-- and his-- are irrelevant. But a lot of people don't seem to understand that, and that's why belief in a soul and an afterlife persists, even among people who aren't religious-- including some of my fellow atheists. 

We humans view death in a very curious way. We understand that it's inevitable, but it's also something we avoid talking honestly about, almost always sugarcoating it with euphemistic language in even some of the most horrific of circumstances. We will just as easily use the term "passed away" to gloss over the protracted and torturous demise of a 40-year-old victim of Lou Gehrig's Disease as we would for the peaceful death of a 100-year-old whose organs have quietly shut down. There is even a level of denial at some funerals, at which the body is injected with formaldehyde and made up to appear merely asleep, a practice that I have always found creepy. Additionally, we often bury bodies in expensive and ornate caskets, as if our loved one is going to reanimate and wake up and appreciate the beautiful lace trim that lines the inside.

I am not saying that people shouldn't have the types of funerals and memorials that are meaningful to them. I can see how a viewing might give people closure, but I wouldn't be caught dead at one. Rather, my larger point is that I prefer to discuss death plainly. This is something I have given a lot of thought to over the years, but especially in the past three months following the death of my longtime therapist, Oren. I realize that thinking so deeply about this issue is beyond scientific fascination: it has been part of my grieving process and that I approach grief, in some ways, differently than most people. I hate not having closure, and having only limited information about how Oren died wasn't something I could easily accept. I've lost count of how many Google searches I ran to try to paint a coherent picture of what brought his life to an abrupt end. But I was only left with more questions that will probably never be answered. Ultimately, what I understand is that a process in Oren's body failed and as a result so did all of the other biological processes necessary to keep him alive-- because that is exactly what death is. 

I found myself thinking about the worst part of the process-- the tragedy that is brain death. The human brain spends decades accumulating knowledge, understanding, and insight. It is shaped by its genetic predispositions that interact with the environment to form a unique personality. And yet, within mere minutes of oxygen depravation, that system-- which many people interpret as a soul-- is irreversibly damaged and ultimately destroyed. As decomposition progresses, that bit of precious biological hardware liquifies to a yogurt-like consistency in a matter of days. To say that my blood runs cold just thinking about that what made Oren, Oren is now in this state is an understatement.

I suppose my form of grieving and the denial that some people have about the finality of death are two sides of the same coin. The idea of simply no longer existing is too much for us to wrap our heads around, not just philosophically but also literally: how does it feel to not be conscious at all, not even in the minimally-conscious state under general anesthesia? It's a nonsense question with no answer. And in the absence of scientific explanation combined with grief, most human societies throughout history have postulated the idea of a soul or something similar. Many people still adhere to the idea to provide a comforting answer to an impossible question and to ease their grief, even while possibly harboring doubts that they don't want to face. I, on the other hand, search for answers to try to get a better understanding of the process of death and its aftermath. I don't think this has anything to do with autism, except perhaps in the sense that I'm more willing to disregard taboo and openly admit to it. 

That's not to say I don't also grieve in ways that are typical. Like many people after losing someone they care about, I cried a lot after Oren died. I fought back tears nearly every day for weeks, and had four intense crying episodes in the first month alone. I had moments where I felt a little guilt about certain interactions that I could have handled differently, even though I know Oren, having been my therapist, would not have dwelled on them. After a few days, I came to realize that I had grown to love him, and grappled with understanding why this reality never dawned on me while he was alive. I even use language that the casual observer might misread as religious: recently, I said to someone that while I would never wish death upon anyone, it is just awful that a kind, caring soul like Oren had to die while people who are destroying the country and the planet have already outlived him.* But here I was being poetic, not professing a supernatural belief.

Returning to the incredulity others have expressed as to how I am okay with the finality of death, I should clarify that I am not. But, as I said earlier, my feelings are beside the point. I care about what's true, and all of the available evidence points to death being the literal end of one's existence. Importantly, I see this reality as a call to action, a reminder of the importance of appreciating the one life we know we have and to help make the world a better place. 

In a bit of irony that hasn't escaped me, I end with a quote from the Bible: "Do not boast about tomorrow, for you do not know what a day may bring forth."



*Do you even need to ask who I'm talking about?