The
Facebook events page boasted “Family Movie Night: Moana” in the Boston Commons.
Immediately, a
vivid image formed in my head: Jen and Chris, a young mother and father in
their mid-thirties, are leading their two children, aged five and seven,
through Boston’s downtown park. Jen is holding one hand of each of her
children. Chris is carrying two folding chairs for himself and his wife and two
sleeping bags for the children. Jen is also carrying something—a third child,
due in two months.
The five-year-old,
Emma, carries her Moana doll. Dangling by the arm, the doll’s dress beginning
to tear at the seams from hours of play with Emma and her best friend, Olivia,
who also has a Moana doll. They’re
long-lost twin sisters, was the compromise the two girls had agreed upon,
as neither could be bothered to play the part of another character. The
seven-year-old, Liam, is wearing his Maui T-shirt, Maui’s trademark words
“You’re welcome!” splayed across the front, with Maui himself flashing his mischievous
grin. Liam is carrying a toy of his own, in this case a plastic version Maui’s
magic fishhook, which flashes lights and makes sounds when he swings it. Liam
and his best friend, Noah, love to take turns pretending to be Maui and playing
tricks on the neighborhood kids.
Family Movie Night
will be a fun-filled experience for the children. Emma will love watching her
favorite Disney Princess learn to sail and navigate the world, and Liam will crack
up at Maui’s antics, such as when he pees in the ocean while Moana’s hand is
dipped in the water.
Chris and Jen
aren’t thinking about whether or not they will enjoy the movie: This outing is
for their kids, and this movie is for kids.
Tomorrow, Chris and Jen are going to meet with their neighbors, another married
couple with young children. These parents will talk about how Ava has taken her
first steps, and how Logan will be starting pre-school at the end of the
summer. Then, the two families will meet yet another set of parents and their
young children for lunch at Margarita’s in Waltham for a birthday lunch: their
little boy, Elijah, is turning six tomorrow. And he is starting first grade in
September.
After
lunch, they will go to the playground. The six parents will sit and talk about
their children while said kids, all the best of friends, play together. They
are children after, all, and childhood is a time when friendship exists without
any significant barriers. Chris and Jen, however, are very selective as to who
they allow in their social circle: They don’t have any friends who do not have
children. In fact, when they got married, they severed contact with all their single
friends. It was not a formal “parting of ways”; they simply stopped answering
emails and phone calls from them, hoping that they would eventually get the
hint. In fact, they didn’t invite them to the wedding or even accept their
friend requests on Facebook. They kept their married friends around, assuming all
of them would eventually have children. But when one couple remained childless
after ten years, Chris and Jen excised them as well. We’re in
a different stage of our lives, they rationalized. We’ve outgrown these other people. If they don’t have children, then we
have nothing in common with them.
The
Facebook page that advertised the Moana
movie night was dated last summer, but I only saw the event page a couple
months ago while searching to see if there was a showing of Moana in Boston: I hadn’t seen the movie
in theaters, and I was hoping to see it on a “big screen” of some sort, perhaps
with a friend. It had become one of my favorite movies after I first saw it
last year, so of course I had to collect some of the merchandise: I have two
Maui figures, one Moana figure, and Maui and Moana rag dolls; my laptop is
covered with Moana stickers that came
from the children’s picture books that I had bought (mostly for the superb
illustrations). It turns out that in the first week of August, there will be a
showing of Moana on Revere Beach. I
will most certainly go, possibly alone, but one of my New York friends, who
also loves that movie and who I’ve been needling to visit me, is going to see
if she come that weekend.
If my friend and I
go to this movie, no doubt we will be the anomaly among an audience of mostly
young, isolated parents and their children, carrying Moana dolls and Maui’s
magic fishhook. The kids in attendance are in the process of forming their
identities, but little do they know that it is a temporary thing. Their parents
have long ago left their own identities behind: they are no longer artists,
writers, dancers, musicians, nerds, jocks, or any semblance of the personas that
they had assumed while growing up. They are Parents, full stop. As they
eventually learned, childhood isn’t a real thing; it’s not even a dress
rehearsal for adult life. It’s a fake world created by the parents for the kids
until they are old enough to marry and start a family. Life does not become
real until you are married with kids and recreating the fake world for the next
generation to inhabit for a couple decades. Those who never figure this out and
don’t put away childish things have failed a major life test.
While I only came
up with the details of the story just now as I wrote this, the general idea
sprouted the moment I saw the ad for Family Movie Night: Isolated parents who
had long ago seemingly stepped off a spaceship on another planet with exclusive
membership, a holier-than-thou society where any adult who wasn’t married with
children (or with the intention of having children) was an unperson, lightyears
behind on an apparently linear, unidirectional trajectory of life and beneath
them in every way. Why in the world did reading an ad for a showing of Moana trigger this vivid image in my
head? Because I had been in a very dark place: My friend, Ryan, had gotten into
a serious relationship and I hadn’t heard from him in months. He was blatantly
ignoring my Facebook messages, and I kept thinking that it was due to of
something like what I’ve just described: that he had “moved on” because he was at
a stage in life that I have no way of knowing if I will ever enter.
A few nights ago,
Ryan and I saw each other for the first time since January. We met for dinner
and had a long talk about everything that had happened. It turned out that a
message that I had sent Ryan in April, after we had briefly gotten back in
touch, regarding concerns about the dynamics of our relationship was something
that he had not been in an appropriate state of mind to address, as he had been
overwhelmed by other things in his life. He also said that he had been
realizing some things about himself that he didn’t want to face and that my
message was yet another example being brought to his attention.
Ryan had meant to
get back to me but the longer he put it off… the longer he put it off until
ultimately it would’ve been too little too late, in his mind. He compared it to
someone in debt who kept putting off paying bills until finally cutting his
losses and declaring bankruptcy. Ryan had absolutely no idea how hurtful these
actions were until one day when I messaged him with the direct question, “Are
we still friends?”. He certainly didn’t realize how they made me second-guess
myself and the way I’m hardwired and the way I live my life, feeling as though
I’m a child: I’m demisexual (Google it), I don’t date, and I’ve never been in a
relationship. He realizes now that his
behavior was hurtful and has since apologized. The two of us agreed to meet
halfway on how we communicate; if Ryan doesn’t respond to messages right away,
I’ll be patient, and in turn Ryan will acknowledge my messages but let me know
if he’s too busy to talk or hang out.
Sure, you might
say, people isolate themselves for a few months in the beginning of a
relationship, but then when things calm down a bit, their friendships return to
normal. Unfortunately, I did not have that kind of luxury to make that
assumption about Ryan’s lack of communication, and for the few months that he
and I had been out of touch, I was racking my brain trying to figure out why
this was happening. I was also convinced that I would never see or even talk to
him again. Because I have a history of friends ghosting me—such as in 2008,
when Melanie, my best friend of sixteen years did
not invite me to her wedding and completely cut me off —my reflexive
reaction is to assume that I have done something to make the other person
angry, uncomfortable, or otherwise feel that the only possible way to handle
the situation is to terminate all contact with me.
The situation with
Melanie was very traumatic, and between that and Ryan’s lack of responsiveness,
seeing that advertisement for Family Movie Night led to the above story being
planted in my head. I have had similar embittered reactions when seeing this commercial and this commercial, both of
which depict parenthood in an idyllic manner. Ever since the estrangement from
Melanie, I reflexively think that in general I cannot—that is, I literally am not allowed—to be friends with
people in relationships, let alone be friends with people who are married and
have kids. If I met the right guy, sure, I probably would get married, or at
least cohabitate. But as I’m demisexual, it’s not something that’s on my radar.
I can literally count on my fingers the number of people I’ve been attracted
to, and obviously my being attracted to that person is only half the equation:
the other person has to reciprocate. Given that I experience attraction so
infrequently to begin with, the chances of a mutual interest are very low. And I absolutely do not want to have kids
(I’d have to change my mind very quickly anyway, as I’m 37).
Why should my
relative lack of interest in romance and sex and my decision not to have kids
preclude me from being friends with people in serious relationships? When
Melanie got married and cut me off, my mother told me that married couples
usually cut off their single friends (she doesn’t recall putting it in those extreme
terms, but I remember vividly that she did). She also said that when you get
married it is a different stage of your life. Same as when you have kids.
Although she has since retracted her statements excusing Melanie’s actions and has
apologized profusely, it is difficult for me to forget. My vivid memory is both
a blessing and a curse. Besides, I have heard that same mantra over and over
again about “different stages” from a number of people. Some people have also
called me “naïve”—a term that implies social immaturity—due to my inexperience
in romantic and sexual relationships. Wouldn’t the more neutral “inexperienced”
do? Apparently not, because the idea that experience with romance, sex, and the
desire to have children make you an adult instead of one type of adult is so ingrained in our society. It’s as if life
is a linear, unidirectional pathway with milestones that are objectively on a
higher tier than others. Additionally, the idea that you can either be a
married adult with children or be a proverbial child yourself is a false
dichotomy, yet many people fail to realize that.
The notion that
relationships, marriage, and children are “stages” is one that makes me cringe.
In fact, recently, literally hours before Ryan responded to my “Are we still
friends?” message, I was telling somebody at work about what was going on. I
sought his advice because he was talking to me about his girlfriend and some of
their shared friends. My coworker started with the damned “stages” mantra. I
said, “No. Puberty is a stage. Old age is a stage. These are all stages that
everybody goes through as long as they live long enough.” My coworker interrupted,
saying, “Everybody also falls in love.” I said, “No. No they don’t. Just listen. I’ve never been in a
relationship. It’s hard to say if I ever will be. It’s naïve to say that everybody falls in love.” I then explained to him
what it means to be demisexual and also said, “And as for having kids? That’s
not in my future.” My coworker has one hand that has only two digits. I wish I
would thought to ask him how he would feel if someone had said to him,
“Everybody has ten fingers.” It is frustrating when there are things that most
people take for granted that are just not part of your own life.
As for Ryan, when we
had our talk, I told him about the fears and second-guessing that plagued my
mind during the months that we hadn’t spoken. Was he cutting me off?, I had
wondered. If so, was it because I had never been in a relationship and that
made me a child in his eyes? That was a notion that I had seriously entertained
during those few months. I then confessed that I felt like an overgrown child. For
example, when I’m at Target I might see parents buying Moana figures for their five-year-olds, and I’m there at age 37 buying
these toys for myself: I haven’t left the fake world that adults create for
children before boarding the spaceship and heading to the planet where real
life begins.
Ryan commented
that the idea that my sexuality, relationship status, and parent status should
have any impact on who I can be friends with is ridiculous. He also said that
he too sometimes feels like an overgrown child. For one thing, he likes things
like action figures, children’s cartoons, and video games. Although already
married once, he hasn’t had children yet and members of his family are
pressuring him to remarry and have children. He told me that the fact that he
hasn’t done this yet makes him feel like people see him as immature. I was
floored when Ryan told me this. He’s 32 years old, and in 2018 being someone
who wants to have kids and to have not had them yet at age 32 is increasingly
common; my cousin had her first and only child just two months before her 39th
birthday. But Ryan’s family is from the south and, presumably, they have a more
conservative outlook on life: Get married and have children by a certain age,
because that’s what you’re supposed
to do. But why? How does it affect his family members? These aren’t parents
begging for grandchildren—his parents are deceased—and his two siblings already
have children. So it’s unlikely a matter of pressure to continue the family
name or to quell “baby fever” (not that anybody should pressure family to do
this anyway) and more likely a question of what one has to do to be an
adult. It’s attitudes like this that
fuel the cynical and embittered scenario like the one I opened this blog with.
Another scenario
that kept coming into my mind over the course of the few months that Ryan and I
hadn’t been speaking—partially because friends and family who I’d been talking
to about this put it there—was that Ryan’s girlfriend perhaps had told Ryan she
didn’t want him having opposite-sex friends. Initially, I dismissed the idea as
ridiculous: In 2018? In Boston? And
how threatening to their relationship would I, an androgynous, autistic,
almost-asexual person, be? But since so many people suggested it, I truly began
to believe it. What then? Should I stop making friends with heterosexual guys
in case they get into relationships, because then they have to cut off their
opposite-sex friends? And what if one partner of an opposite-sex relationship
is bisexual? No friends for that person because everyone is a potential sex
partners? Should I join the polyamorous community where there would likely be
no politics involving the sex of the person you’re friends with? Ryan told me
that this was another red herring: his girlfriend trusted him. She not only
knows who I am but also knows that Ryan has several friends who are women. It’s
not an issue.
What it ultimately
came down to was that my message to Ryan about my concerns about our friendship
was poorly-timed, and Ryan’s judgment of how to handle it was reckless. It had
nothing to do with my sexuality, my lifestyle, Ryan’s girlfriend being
territorial, or Ryan feeling like he was in a “different stage of his life” and
that I was immature compared to him. While I know logically that anybody who
writes me off as a friend because of my being single/childless childfree/anything
else that precludes societal-expected adulthood is an ignorant person who is
not worth my time, it’s difficult for me to put that into practice. The idea of
somebody cutting off their single friends once they marry is cliché for a
reason. After hearing stories like this so many times, having had it happen to
me once and my fearing that it had happened to me yet again, eventually I begin
to ask if I’m the one with the problem rather than conclude that a remarkable
number of people are ignorant, inconsiderate, and limited.
I want to
emphasize that when I talk about what happened with Melanie, my best friend of
sixteen years, and what I thought was happening with Ryan, I am not talking
about a natural, gradual drifting apart. I am talking about the sudden and
deliberate excision of the other person from their life once they marry, an
exclusionary action so severe that the former friends are not even connected on
social media: Ten years ago, Melanie rejected my friend request on the
then-popular MySpace (to my knowledge she is not on Facebook). I realize that
when your friends marry and have children, of course you are not going to see
them as frequently and that you have to adjust certain dynamics of the
relationship. When my cousin Melinda had her child, I fully expected that
whenever I hang out with Melinda her son will be there, at least until he is
old enough to be alone more of the time. So I not only have adapted, but I have
made an effort to establish a relationship with this child. He is only 3 years
old, and I don’t think he’s seen me enough to recognize me. But when I do see
him, I read to him and play with him, and not just because he is family either.
I would adapt in this way even if a non-relative had a child.
Now, if only
society would adapt a bit more.
No comments:
Post a Comment